
| |||||
|
Vic Daniel Speaker of the Guild
Sometimes described as an art form, sometimes as science-based, the reality of hoof trimming is the elevation of science to an art form.
Both concepts must function together in harmony. Accept what you see, the animal, its' feet and legs and the environment they are exposed to as scientific evidence.
Visualizing a foot shape beneficial to the animal and crafting that shape with a sharp tool is the art form.
Both concepts combined create a unique discipline which is to change what you can and accept what you cannot change in the animal's foot to achieve the goal of hoof trimming.
The goal of hoof trimming is to return the foot to normal shape(see Kansas Adaptation to the Dutch Flat Method)allowing the animal to regain a normal gait.
The animals normality may have become undone by overgrown hooves, pain from foot afflictions, such as ulcers or laminitis.
Normal is a key word now being applied not only by hoof trimmers but also researchers and breed classifiers that have adjusted
their view of cattle feet from an ideal shape to a practical shape that will allow the animal to walk in a comfortable and
anatomically correct fashion. Normally, ungulated (hoofed animals)animals' claws are always concave.
Since the earliest mentions of hoof trimming for animal relief in the late 1880's and early 1900's
the act of hoof trimming has advanced from vet and farm care to custom work by individuals in the late 1950's and 60's
that would shorten the toe and concave the claw. In the 1980's bio-mechanical research of cattle was begun by E. Toussaint Raven,
who was the originator of the Dutch Flat Method of trimming. This research of understanding
the mechanics of the bone structure in relation to claw shape has been boon to help understand the impact of trimming.
As trimmers, we reserve the right to learn and chose which application we apply to a given animal.
We can do so with the confidence of years of research work available today to benefit animal well-being.
This is why in 2007 the OHTG adopted the Recommended Code of Practice.
One method cannot always do it all in every situation.
| |||||
|
